“OUR RESISTANCE IS AS GLOBAL AS YOUR OPPRESSION” Multinational Corporations, the Protest Movement and the Future of Global Governance

نویسنده

  • Stephen J. Kobrin
چکیده

provided helpful comments on the previous version. 2 " Yet, the basic adjustments demanded by the globalization trend cannot take place without a struggle. Too many interests in the nation states see the economic risks and costs of the adjustments involved, even if justified in the longer term, as unfairly distributed and deeply threatening. In addition, organizations with political or social objectives…see the expanding economic power of multinational enterprises as both a threat and an opportunity; in either case, their hope is to harness the multinationals to their global objectives. 1 " N30, " " A16 " and " J18 " are movements associated with the dates of large, disparate, and at times violent protests against globalization in Seattle, Washington and London. They were followed by similar events in Prague and Davos, Switzerland. While the protest movement, can be chaotic, less than articulate and uncertain about alternative futures, it should not be dismissed. Although the extent of popular support for the protests is far from clear, they may reflect widespread angst about the direction that globalization has taken, a sense of a loss of democratic control over outcomes, and a lack of faith in the legitimacy of international institutions. The anti-globalization and anti-multinational corporation (MNC) movement is comprised of a large number of very different groups with a wide range of concerns: the environment, labor and worker rights, human rights, poverty, inequality, neoliberalism, and consumerism, among others. International economic institutions such as the World Trade Organization, the World Bank and the IMF are one clear target: " Defund the Fund " and " Break the Bank " have become oft-repeated mantras of the marchers. The power and dominance of multinational corporations, however, is an underlying and unifying theme. Globalization is " corporate globalization. " In Ralph Nader's words, globalization represents an institutionalized " global economic and political structure that makes every government increasingly hostage to a global financial 3 and commerce system engineered through an autocratic system of international governance that favors corporate interests " (Wallach and Sforza 1999, p. ix). Protests against international business and multinational corporations are not new, they go back to at least the middle of the 19 th century. In this paper, I argue that the current protests differ significantly from past criticism in a number of ways. MNCs typically have been taken to task for specific reasons, for " doing something wrong: " The …

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Your Call Could not be Completed as Dialled: Why Truth Does not Speak to Power In Global Health; Comment on “Knowledge, Moral Claims and the Exercise of Power in Global Health”

This article contends that legitimacy in the exercise of power comes from the consent of those subject to it. In global health, this implies that the participation of poor country citizens is required for the legitimacy of major actors and institutions. But a review of institutions and processes suggests that this participation is limited or absent. Particularly because of the complex political...

متن کامل

New Global Governance and the Future of the State Institution in the Middle East

Changes in the international system, along with crises in the Middle East and the emergence of inefficient states coexisting with religious and racial groups in the region, make one wonder about the nature of the state in today’s systematic world, in general, and the nature of the state in the Middle East, in particular. The present study provides a theoretical framework based on quantum mechan...

متن کامل

Global Health Governance Challenges 2016 – Are We Ready?

The year 2016 could turn out to be a turning point for global health, new political realities and global insecurities will test governance and financing mechanisms in relation to both people and planet. But most importantly political factors such as the global power shift and “the rise of the rest” will define the future of global health. A new mix of health inequity and security challenges has...

متن کامل

Paradigm Shift: New Ideas for a Structural Approach to NCD Prevention; Comment on “How Neoliberalism Is Shaping the Supply of Unhealthy Commodities and What This Means for NCD Prevention”

It is a well-documented fact that transnational corporations engaged in the production and distribution of health-harmful commodities have been able to steer policy approaches to address the associated burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). While the political influence that corporations wield stems in part from significant financial resources, it has also been ena...

متن کامل

Business as Usual: A Lack of Institutional Innovation in Global Health Governance; Comment on “Global Health Governance Challenges 2016 – Are We Ready?”

There were once again high expectations that a major global health event - the Ebola virus outbreak of 2014-2015 - would trigger meaningfully World Health Organization (WHO) reform and strengthen global health governance (GHG). Rather than a “turning point,” however, the global community has gone back to business as usual. This has occurred against a backdrop of worldwide political turmoil, cha...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2001